On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:58:35PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:35:51 -0800, Gary Kline <kl...@thought.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:40:13 -0800, Gary Kline <kl...@thought.org> wrote: > >
[[ save the electrons!]] > > Your code copies flawlessly. I noticed late last night that cmp uses > > the same byte-by-byte cp and IIRC checks each to make certain they > > bytes are identical. My copyFile() function simply used fopen, fgets, > > and fputs. I yanked it from a program that copied files from ~/Mail > > where the lines were around 80 bytes rather than in the thousands. > > With few newlines. The gotcha got me, in other words! Thanks much > > for the function! > > That's good news, because I didn't even compile it. I just wrote it in > my mailer and hit send. I'm glad it worked :) > > For what it's worth, if you are not handling *text* files, fgets() and > fputs() are probably a bad idea. They are line oriented, and they > depend on the presence of '\n' characters. The concept of ``lines'' is, > at best, ill defined for binary files. So it makes more sense to use > either byte-for-byte copies and rely on stdio to do buffering, or to use > some sort of custom buffer and fread()/fwrite() or plain read()/write(). > Just got up from a nap [ and *coffee*]. Still, after last night's until past 03.30 with TWO giggling teenagers, god help me:) --never had sleepover when i was 13-- Anyway, your comment about writing that from scratch brought to mind something I've been pondering recently. I already have several kinds of main() functions that let you go in various directions. Input by re-direction, input from the cmdline, even both. These save me typing maybe 20 to 50 lines. If you enjoy typing and rewriting code rom scratch a zillion times, fine, but at least I would rather use my ``prefab'' main()'s. I also have some very simple and efficient string-matching functions [[ for SHORT lines!! ]] and other thing we do very often. It was (is?) throw-away code. Does it made sense to have a place on the web where you can get these kind of canned functions? I have perhaps 20 of these functions named and tagged. This was, I believe, at least one idea behind C++, but at least I have never seen any sites that offer C or C++ functions to do ``X''. gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org The 2.17a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"