On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:04:00 -0500 Neal Hogan <nealho...@gmail.com> wrote: > But, I wonder what the most efficient way is to update ports. I > appreciate Adam's point about the fact that portupgrade (and > portmanager and portmaster) are ports themselves and are going to not > be as reliable as what is in base.
IMO this doesn't make any sense. If portupgrade is failing on a port where manual "make install" works, then portupgrade simply has a bug. Any port upgrading tool belongs in a port, because it's more important that it responds to changes in the ports system than changes in the base system. As to upgrading piecemeal rather than with -a, I don't see how that helps, and it may actually make things worse by not building in dependency order. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"