> > We had problem with "named" starting on boot on a FreeBSD 6.1 server,
> > managed
> > by /etc/rc.conf.
> >
> > The startup script failed with errors about shared library "libm.so.2"
> > failing
> > to load because of something related to libxml2.so.5.
> >
> > Later, when I then tried starting it via /etc/rc.d/named it worked fine.
> >
> > I include the following "ldd" output in case it's helpful. What could
> > possibly
> > be the issue here?
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > ###
> >
> > # ldd /usr/sbin/named
> > /usr/sbin/named:
> > libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x281ff000)
> > libxml2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 (0x282f1000)
> > libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x283ef000)
> > libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x284e3000)
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x284f9000)
> > libm.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/compat/libm.so.2 (0x285d1000)
>
> I also see to LOCAL libraries in it. named is part of base, unless you
> compiled and installed the port version and maybe told it to overwrite the
> base.
>
> None of this adds up.
>
> %ldd /usr/sbin/named
> /usr/sbin/named:
> libcrypto.so.5 => /lib/libcrypto.so.5 (0x281fe000)
> libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x28357000)
> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2836a000)
>
> There's a named on 7.1p4
Thanks for the response. I've now compared this named 'ldd' outfit to another
6.1 install we have that also runs named. It has the exact same file size and
version,
but slightly different ldd output:
-- from the second machine with FreeBSD 6.1
# ldd /usr/sbin/named
/usr/sbin/named:
libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x281ff000)
libxml2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 (0x282f1000)
libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x283ff000)
libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x2840f000)
libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x284fc000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x28512000)
####
XML is still there, but the mention of libm.so no longer points into
/usr/local/lib/compat
This other FreeBSD user also found the libxml link:
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2008-November/073929.html
I also checked "/etc/make.conf" on both machines. They mentioned X11_BASE and
Perl... nothing about XML. However, these machines have evolved some over time.
Perhaps something
with there in the past.
It sounds like advisable paths forward include re-compiling or re-installing
named.
Mark
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
