Erich Dollansky wrote: > Because people using them, new what they were doing. > And probably didn't care... > IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the > Itanium? > The one that didn't stick... indeed. > Yes, also Intel can fail. Intel also failed with their first 32 > bit design. Wasn't iAPX-32 ist name? Long before the 80386 came > up? > As I was an embryo when the 80386 was first produced, I searched for this one... Possibally the same thing though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_iAPX_432
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
