On Aug 17, 2009, at 7:27 PM, RW wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:41:12 -0500
Andrew Gould <andrewlylego...@gmail.com> wrote:
STABLE is what it sounds like.
I don't think it is what it sounds like - STABLE branches are
development branches with stable binary interfaces. It's the security
branches that are intended for production use.
It's reasonable for people who update and build their own software
image to do some level of qualification of the result, before
deploying this to production systems. Whether you track -STABLE or
the security branch for your initial release ought to be determined
more by your preferences to minimize the scope of OS updates versus
your desire for relevant new functionality.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
