RW wrote:
So are scripts actually incapable of running setuid?
They aren't on Linux. I learned about that a while back when I
investigated setuid scripts for a coworker.
It's not that setuid shell scripts are really more inherently insecure
than programs written in C. The problem is more that those who write
such scripts tend not to observe the proper precautions.
For example if you don't set the PATH explicitly, and you don't give
absolute pathnames to all the subprograms you run, then a trojan that
has the same name as some standard program can get run as root.
If a program is going to be setuid at all, you really have to know what
you're doing when you write it or else you'll find yourself opening a
can of worms.
Mike
--
Michael David Crawford
m...@prgmr.com
prgmr.com - We Don't Assume You Are Stupid.
Xen-Powered Virtual Private Servers: http://prgmr.com/xen
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
