> Well, this would certainly help with building the ports safely. But I > think we -- at least I was -- were thinking that you would actually > leave them in the jail, and run them from the jailed environment, so > there would be fewer run-time problems, and no work to transfer them > over. Remember that you've got to ensure that there is no problem > with run-time linking of shared libraries, some of which (in your > current scheme) will have both 32-bit and 64-bit versions with the > same soname. You can probably work around this problem as well, but > it seems easier to leave them in the jail. >
With only console stuff, that'd probably be fine, a jail wouldn't be much more tedious than the environment shuffling I'd need to run the 32 bit stuff, however I'll want to do some X11 stuff.. I know you can access X between different users on a machine, but can a jail'ed shell open a window on an X server running from the main machine? I'm not even sure what terms I would use for searching on how to get that working. Thanks, -Jim Stapleton _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"