On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:43:11 -0600
Stephen Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:33:08 -0600
> "Darryl Hoar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Greetings,
> > I have posted several questions regarding an arplookup failure 
> > message I have been receiving.  I have google'd until my 
> > eyes are falling out, and have found nothing that explains
> > how to FIX the problem.
> > 
> > I am running 4.7-stable on a box.  It is my firewall, nat box.
> > ep0 is connected to my ISP's dsl.  ep1 is connected to 
> > my internal private LAN.  My internal lan uses the private
> > ip addresses 192.168.1.x.   I have two machines on my
> > internal lan, not including the firewall box.
> > 
> > I am getting 
> >   /kernel arplookup failure: 10.1.1.1 not on local network.
> > 
> > my ISP assigns a real IP to my ep0 interface usings dhcp.
> > 
> > what is causing this and how do I stop it ?  I have added a 
> > rule to block 10.x.x.x in, but it has not stopped the messages.
> > 
> > I can ping 10.1.1.1, and if I down ep0, I cannot ping 10.1.1.1.
> > 
> > I have alerted my ISP to this problem (thought 10.x.x.x weren't
> > suppose to be routed).
> 
> Darryl,
> 
> What IP addresses does your DSL router use, possibly 10.x.x.x ?
> 

Whoops, re-read your post, my bad.  I have seen ISP's use 
non-routable IP's in their infrastructure before, this is 
"not a good thing" but helps them conserve IP addresses.

Can you traceroute to 10.1.1.1 or a polite nmap, this may provide 
you with some more clues.


Regards,

Stephen Hilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Reply via email to