On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 07:17:51 +1100, Sue Blake wrote: >On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:28:14PM -0500, taxman wrote: >> On Friday 14 March 2003 08:23 pm, Wizard of Wor wrote: >> > I was unable to find the minimum requirements on x86 platform. Can I >> > run FreeBSD on mz 486dx2 8Mb laptop smoothly? >> >> The install documentation or the FAQ does have this answer, but yes you should >> be able to run fine on this machine. Just don't try to install X windows, >> unless you set up a *lot* of swap. It also depends a little bit on if there >> is any noncooperative hardware on the machine. Laptops tend to have some of >> that. Best bet is to try it. 4.x will probably work the best for you. > > >This memory question comes up a lot, and I'm not sure how up to date >that part of the documentation is. Has anyone _definitely_ run an >install on a machine with only 8MB in the last couple of years? > >Twice I have failed to install (boot floppy with CD) to machines with >only 8MB RAM. It could have been FreeBSD 4.4, but I think it was >FreeBSD 3.3. I'd love to discover that I'm wrong here. > >Of course the alternative is to put the disk in another machine to do >the install, then it should run OK back in the 8MB machine. As for X, >forget trying it. If it was installed it "would run" but not usably, >no matter how much swap. Without X and with plenty of swap you can do >a lot with your 8MB in text mode if you can get an installation going. >I had a 386 with 8MB running FreeBSD 2.x (without X) that ran much >faster than the NT4 pentium beside it. The 486 CPU should be fine.
AFAIK, you need 12meg to install, but only 8 to run. I wouldnt run it will less than 16 or 24. I had 28 megs in a old 486-133, and 4.3-release ran great. --- doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
