On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:48:22PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:36:53 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi > <bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > >Giorgos Keramidas <keram...@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: > >> Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here: > >> > >> keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim* > >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel - 5757731 1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 > >> vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz > > > > Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for <E>ighty > > <M>egabytes <A>nd <C>onstantly <S>wapping! *GRIN* > > That's an old joke, but it's not particularly good anymore.
. . . probably because it's increasingly inaccurate. Eighty was "the good ol' days". -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpZIP1xtwvq1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
