Thanks. I guess I should started with that first. It's a nice program, so if I can reduce it's load a bit that would be great.

I tried setting Xmx to 16M and removed the '-server' from the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openfire script
    openfire_javargs="-Xmx16M"

ps shows that it took the setting:
/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java -jar -Xmx16M -Dopenfire.lib.dir=/usr/local/share/java/classes -DopenfireHome=/usr/local/shar

From top:
40724 openfire 13 20 0 214M 70336K kserel 0 0:24 0.89% java
Top still shows it 214M Size with ~70M Res

That's better, but still seems a bit much. Not sure why it's still allocating that, I guess it might be native libs or something?

We all spammed a bunch of text to each other (a ton more than normal usage) and still it works fine. Any way to get it down more?


On 8/3/2010 5:15 PM, Charles Richards wrote:
You can tune the openfire JVM configuration to run in 256MB of RAM, possibly less 
with only<  6 users.
You also do not need to use an external DB for it - it can run with it's own 
embedded DB.

It's probably the easiest to install / configure Jabber client I've come 
across, but there's a good list noted here: 
http://xmpp.org/software/servers.shtml




Charles Richards
www.charlesrichards.net
richar...@gmail.com




On Aug 3, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Bill Moran wrote:

In response to Depo Catcher<depocatc...@gmail.com>:
I have a combination of Spark (windows client) and Open Fire (FreeBSD
server, actually Java) for my lan.
We've used this setup for years, but the OpenFire server takes up ~500 +
MB.

Anyways, we were looking for something a bit smaller.
We just need to send text messages to LAN users (less than 6) and
supports a nice windows client.
We're not suppose to use any external services (yahoo messenger, aol, etc)
We've been using Jabber for several years internally.  Works well and
has clients for just about every OS I know of.

Don't know if it could be considered lightweight, though, since it
requires an SQL server on the backend.  If you already have another
SQL server in production, you could just install the DB there, as its
DB usage is pretty light.

--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to