On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:33 -0500
Doug Poland <d...@polands.org> articulated:
> If I understand the OPs question correctly, I believe setting the
> environment variable BATCH=yes will give desired results with
> portupgrade. This will cause port compile defaults to be used in
> lieu of an existing /var/db/ports/*/options file.
I was of the opinion, and I could be wrong, that setting 'BATCH=yes'
simply stopped the build process from attempting to create an options
file; however, it would use an existing one if it was present. Perhaps
someone with more intimate knowledge of this would care to comment. I
say this because I have used the BATCH technique once I had all of my
ports configured the way I wanted. Subsequent updates always appeared to
use any existing configuration files.
--
Jerry ✌
freebsd.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
I can't mate in captivity.
Gloria Steinem, on why she has never married
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
