Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors request. And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base openssl version and prove them (auditors) that freebsd base openssl are not vulnerable.
2010/11/15 Jerry <freebsd.u...@seibercom.net>: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:40:27 +0300 > c0re <nr1c...@gmail.com> articulated: > >> There are still too many broken ports with openssl from ports, I do >> not like debug it and really like to use base openssl, almost no >> difference. > > Might I suggest that if you are aware of ports that don't work > correctly with the port's version of openssl that you file a PR against > it. I have done so and succeeded in getting several patches issued to > correct the problem. This problem will not go away by itself. > > -- > Jerry ✌ > freebsd.u...@seibercom.net > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
