Hi Mike and thank you for your response please find the smartctl output here:
http://pastecode.org/index.php/view/27349679 will do the atacontrol comparison later on since I would ahve to upgrade the system again. I stressed the hdd now with the old kernel for several hours copying reading/writing large amounts of data without any error. even the filesystem check ran through with just some softupdate inconsistencies but without sector errors... don't know what to think about all this.. Well maybe I should mention that I formatted the hard disk according to this discussion http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=12088&page=3 aligned with the 4k sector size of the drive... regards Michael On 04.12.2010 20:19, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12/4/2010 12:08 PM, Michael Schaefer wrote: >> >> ad4: FAILURE - READ_MUL48 status=51<READY,DSC,ERROR> error=84<ICRC,ABORTED> >> LBA=594632984 > > Those do seem like hardware errors on the disk. But going back to the > old kernel however should not make a difference. Try > (/usr/ports/sysutiles/smartmontools and do a > smartctl -x /dev/ad4 > and see if the drive thinks it has any errors. Does > atacontrol cap ad4 > show any differences between the two kernels ? > > perhaps something new is enabled or disabled between versions like the > power management ? > > ---Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
