On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Timm Wimmers wrote: > Am Freitag, den 03.12.2010, 00:33 -0500 schrieb Weihang Wang: >> Hi Martes, >> >> I have tried the first two interfaces which are said to be supported by >> FreeBSD, they do not work. Surprisingly, now I choose the option "Intel >> PRO/1000 T Server" and in NAT mode, it works now!!!! >> Thank you so much, you do me a great favor!! Hope this also works for Chris! > > In most cases it is better to use bridge mode. In NAT mode your VM get a > private subnet and other devices in your network can't find your VM, > because the VM is behind (or encapsulated in) your HOST (as like as your > HOST is behind your router to the internet). This can work if you define > routes, but bridging is mostly easier. > > In Bridge mode your VM acts like any other machine in your network and > will get an IP-Adress from your DHCP server (if you use DHCP). > > -- > Timm > > [1] HSOT = your Ubuntu Workstation >
Hi, Could someone tell me how to enable Bridge mode? I just change the network settings of my virtual machine, change it to bridged mode. I also select the eth0, which is the physical interface of my system. Then in my virtual machine, I add one line: ifconfig_em0="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf file. I have changed each of the five virtual interfaces Intel and ..., but I could not get network access. If I use NAT mode, one of these five interfaces works fine. But now I do need the Bridged mode because one of my machine would be a server in my experiment. Hope to hear from you. Thanks in advance. Best, W.W._______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"