Le mardi 14 à 22:23, Frédéric Perrin a écrit : > Le lundi 13 à 17:11, Chip Camden a écrit : >> Quoth Frédéric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: >>> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for >>> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM >>> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). >>> >>> This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) >>> refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update >>> /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and >>> rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : >> >> Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually based on >> rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: >> >> rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ >> :tc=rxvt-256color: > > I don't have an entry for rxvt-256color. > > This is happening on 8.1-RELEASE.
Hum, of course I had the idea of looking at the SVN tree only after sending this post. This rxvt-256color definition was added a couple of weeks ago, by a certain Sterling Camden :-). So, I am now able to say that when adding the following entries to 8.1's termcap file, my terminal works as expected : rxvt-256color|rxvt terminal emulator with 256 colors:\ :Co#256:AF=\E[38;5;%dm:AB=\E[48;5;%dm:tc=rxvt-unicode: rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window System):\ :tc=rxvt-256color: (I even got 256 colors in a screen on a Linux machine accessed inside a tmux running on a FreeBSD machine.) Should I send a PR in order to get this new definition installed? -- Fred _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"