Ok, thank you. If I understand what you say there could be an
administrative mess but no real problem with the file system.
Regards
Sven-Åke
2010-12-10 16:09, krad skrev:
On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-Åke Svensson <s...@mbg.se
<mailto:s...@mbg.se>> wrote:
Hi
I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares
using "zfs nfsshare...." as it says in the documentation. Then the
system use the file /etc/zfs/exports.
But I find out that I also can share this directories using the
standard /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares
in the same place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this
way? Anybody know?
System is Freebsd 8.1.
Best regards
Sven-Åke Svensson
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
<mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org>"
if you put it in exports zfs cant manage it, therefore the zfs
filesystem set command becomes redundent and inoperative, so it doesnt
fit in with zfs standard way of doing things. Not really an issue but
possibly a little confusing.
I know its not necessary the case for bsd yet, but on solaris if you
have made the jump to zfs, you have most likely gone for a pure zfs
installation, therefore it all hangs together nicely.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
