On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:24 +0200 "crsnet.pl" <crs...@crsnet.pl> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:26 -0500, "Conrad J. Sabatier" > <conr...@cox.net> wrote: > > > > Strange, flash works fine for me under 9.0-BETA3. Go figure. > > [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ uname -a > FreeBSD x300 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #3: Tue Sep 27 10:47:57 > CEST 2011 cr4sh@x300:/sys/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64 > For me too. But i make csup yesterday, and when i build it. I get > BETA3 but with damaged flash.
Hmmm, most peculiar. My last update was Wed Sep 28 04:37:01 CDT. Was your last kernel/world build a "clean" build? You may want to try updating your sources, nuking /usr/obj, and rebuilding/installing, just in case there's a bit of incompatible cruft lying about somewhere (not likely, I know, but it doesn't hurt to make sure). Also, I have my plugins setup in a "local", rather than a system-wide fashion. I did do a normal install from ports of all of the relevant packages, but then I either copied or symlinked the needed stuff under ${HOME}/.mozilla. I remember when I first went about setting up the flash plugin and the plugin wrapper, I couldn't get it to work properly until I did this. Honestly, I don't know exactly why I've been spared from this recent round of complaints I've seen from people re: flash, acroread, etc. and the linux emulator in general. I'm just glad that I have! Must be living right. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"