ummmm . . . this person has been doing similar "hold-my-hand-I-do-not-want-to-take-the-time" kinda thing on the oBSD lists recently.
On 10/30/11, Zantgo <zan...@gmail.com> wrote: > El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> escribió: > >> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote: >> >>> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost >>> no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also >>> install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly >>> solocionables, for example I had to modify "REFRESH" to "true", but also >>> to get out other errors, commonly have a solution, but is a great problem >>> to have to spend all his time fixing bugs. Please tell me if it is >>> natural to every time I download large modifying ports so, if so, then >>> why say "functional"? >> >> Yes, ports work well. From the description, it's difficult to tell what >> is causing the problem. Please supply additional information, like what >> version of FreeBSD and the exact output of one of the errors (script(1) is >> useful for that). Also see the section in the Handbook about packages and >> ports: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html >> >> Translations of the Handbook can be found at >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/ in the books subdirectory. > > the problem is not the problem, since most are solving the problem is that > there are many errors and problems, then as I say it is stable and > functional?_______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
