On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:35:06 +0000 RW wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:11:18 +1000 > Da Rock wrote: > > > Even under GPL anything built using gcc can be licensed as you like, > > so I doubt it could be that. > > It is that. I don't know the details, but GPLv3 is sufficiently more > viral that recent gcc versions can't be used as the base system > compiler. We're currently stuck with a version from 2007.
I was just wondering what would have happened if Apple hadn't backed clang/LLVM as BSD licensed projects. Was there a plan B (other than gcc 4.2.1) or did Apple save the *BSD world? _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
