Has the discussion on why change to clang been made available?

I would like to know the reasoning.

CLANG isn't GNU licenced. Getting rid of communist licence is right, but still it should not be the prime reason for doing things, as having GNU licenced gcc doesn't really hurt.

personally i don't see CLANG anyhow better for now. AFAIK it is even more bloated than gcc


Or, is it simply a gratuitous  change?

Tom Dean
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to