but not to be turned into closed source products.
What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called
"forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open
your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball...
Give him a break. His heart is in the right place, though his choice of
GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom.
But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO
nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons to use
clang.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
