Because it doesn't address an of the *OTHER* valid reasons why GCC is
being replaced -- among them:
1) GCC's continuously increasing propensity to generate "bad code",
examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good. Why
are you just saying things you know isn't true?
2) The inability of GCC mamintainers to fix _long-standing_ bugs, some
have been identified for over a decade, and have not been fixed.
That's true. still not that much.
3) The continuously increasing trend of introducing 'non standard' features,
No need to use them.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
