> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:18:48 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> > Subject: Re: fsck on FAT32 filesystem? > > > Indeed. > > > > But getting GELI certified and approved by the relevant > > institutions and agencies isn't that easy either. Yet without > > no idea what are you talking about.
Then you would be well advised to keep pie-hole shut. Doing otherwise, as Lincoln put it, "removes all doubt." > As for any government agencies and corporations why you care about their > problems? Does it even *occur* to you that some people use FreeBSD in _business_ operations? Business (or even government) operations which just might have to comply with _laws_ that limit them to using resources that have been "certified" as doing what the law requires such tools do? C.P. has made it clear that she _is_ in am environment where compliance with government edicts on the subject of security _is_ an operational requirement. Including the mandatory use of 'certified' solutions for particcular issues. In her environment, geli could be used 'in addition to' a mandatory, "certified" solution, but *NOT* 'by itself' as a means of dealing with that mandatory requirement -- because it is *not* and approved and 'certified' means of satisfying that requirement. Whether or not you agree with, or even _understand_, the nature of the requirement is immaterial, and irrelevant to C.P.'s situation. She _does_ have to deal with those requirements, which you do not -- your lack of comprension of that =fact= not withstaning. --q6LBAU6u007680.1342869030/mail.r-bonomi.com-- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"