On 28. sep. 2013, at 15:50, Frank Leonhardt <fra...@fjl.co.uk> wrote:
> Given that BIND can happily listen on ports other than 53 and OpenBSD allows > a port to be specified against each nameserver in resolv.conf, it does not > seem an unreasonable question to me. Just to avoid any misunderstanding... Not sure if I misunderstood what you're trying to do, but the way I recall it, you have two boxes, one running with one recursive and one authoritative nameserver, and you wanted a second box to quey the recursive nameserver on the first box, which is running on another port than 53? Given your setup, that's a valid question. It's getting down to patching the resolver I felt was a bit overkill, and a possible source of future pain. How to solve it is a perfectly valid question. Personally I'd just think it cleaner to solve it by running a caching resolver on the second host (on port 53), that could forward queries where you'd like, rather than patching or usik firewall redirects. Terje _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
