On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 23:33, Kirk Strauser wrote: > At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same > > machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES" > > and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I will > > In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave. Does > > this seems ok? Is there a better way. > > This seems to come up every now and then. Before we start, is there any > reason you want to have two seperate named process running, instead of > having one process serving as master to some domains and slave to others?
No, it's generally considered {easier,better,more manageable,...} to only have one instance of BIND. BIND can be master for some domains and slave for others, so there really is no need. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.gaddis.org> _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"