> > > --- Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't find a zero-bad floppy in this place! It's all the holidays! > > That's what AOL disks (vs. discs) used to be good for. :) > > > With `c', they're all offset by 63(why?). But still, you can mount the > > partitions on the ad4s1, so the disklabel should be ok... > > Yeah. Starts to suggest what we were thinking was a evidence related to the > problem is really unrelated and "normal" behavior (is disklabel/bsdlabel > only meant to be run on slices and not bsd-partitions?).
Sorry, I haven't been following this whole thread and so am not responding to your real problem/question. But, just in regards to this fragment: You have it backwards in this question. Disklabel is meant to run only on bsd partitions and not slices. Slices (1-4) are the major divisions of the disk and partitions (a-h) are divisions within slices. Fdisk is what creates slices. ////jerry > Are we looking in > the wrong place? What about that potentially good superblock we found a > while ago? (the skip 16 one that contained "/data" in it) Should we be > saving that somewhere while we can? (how?) > > Anyone out there know 5.x file-system dirtiness like the back of their hand? > C'mon, you know you wanna join the fun. :) > > Where's my time machine so I can go back and back up this drive... ah well > I'm learning a ton. > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
