On Saturday 15 May 2004 03:31, Chuck Swiger wrote: > platanthera wrote: > > On Friday 14 May 2004 00:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > [ ... ] > > >> Yes, you do. But I'm sure that you will find the make.conf(5) > >> manpage very informative and useful. > > > > not really. it says > > ... > > The /etc/make.conf file is included from the appropriate Makefile > > which specifies the default settings for all the available options. > > Options need only be specified in /etc/make.conf when the system > > administrator wishes to override these defaults. > > ... > > The manpage is correct. /etc/make.conf behaves much the same way as > /etc/rc.conf and other config files with regard to default values. > > Take a look in /etc/defaults/make.conf, /etc/defaults/rc.conf, etc.
OK, in case of rc.conf the situation is pretty clear - the general system defaults are defined in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and if you want to change something you edit /etc/rc.conf whose settings override those of /etc/defaults/rc.conf. But what about make.conf? There is no /etc/defaults/make.conf on my sytem (5.2_RELENG), and looking at /usr/src/etc/defaults/ after running cvsup it seems that's correct. I didn't notice when /etc/defaults/make.conf disappeared (during 4.x --> 5.x transition?), but the really important question is: Where are the general system defaults defined now? [...] > Please tell us which port was listing the -O2? Ports which disregard > CFLAGS are considered BROKEN and ought to be fixed... koffice in this case (but I think all the other kde stuff and other ports too) have their own CFLAGS defaults, which get overridden by the system defaults specified in /etc/make.conf or whereever. Think that's OK. regards _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
