On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 12:56, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Bear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > I do have cvsup installed, and can run cvsup to update my ports > > collection. My question is if I already have a package installed, > > running cvsup, the make install again for a preexisting port will mess > > up the pkg-data base right? > > Wrong. If you are installing a port a second time, "make install" will > refuse to install the port because it's already installed. If you are > installing an updated port, then the pkg-data will be in a different > place because the port has a different name. The latter case may leave > parts of the first port laying around unused, and deinstalling it will > probably break the second port. > > > > So, if I only want to upgrade a single > > port, is the recommended way > > 1) pkg_deinstall > > 2) cvsup ports collection > > 3) pkg_install again (or make install) > > This seems rather poor as I don't want to have all the downtime > > between deinstalling and installing again. > > Try this: > > 1) cvsup ports collection > 2) make > 3) pkg_deinstall > 4) make install > > > If I cvsup ports and then make install, is there a fix to update the > > pkg data base? > > It's not needed. > > <mike Of course, this method does not work if there are any packages/ports depending on the port you are upggrading. The pkg_deinstall will fail because of the dependencies. I believe a pkg_deinstall -f will forcibly remove the package anyway. Unfortunately, I still sometimes find the dependent ports need to be recompiled for the new version of the port you are installing. -Matt
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"