On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 05:26:54PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: : Jonathon McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > I know this is not BSD specific, but I just wanted to get your opinions. I : > was wondering what might affect my decision which to use, other than : > licensing and (IIRC) the fancier font handling of Xemacs. : : Both are licensed under the GPL, and the font handling is not : significantly different these days. The "eXtended" features : that give Xemacs its name are only of interest to people who : program emacs heavily in LISP. : : In other words, it's unlikely to matter to you. Try them both : and pick whichever you like.
No big difference in performance (the LISP engine) or memory usage? I'm running on an older, smaller laptop. Xemacs has been fine, but since I am starting over, I thought I'd check out my options. jm -- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"