Hi! "Lars H. Beuse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want some apache NameVirtualHost behind a Paketfilter based on ipf, placed > in two subnets. This router has two Cards one in the private net, one in the > public. So far i just forward port 80 and 443 into my private net > 192.168.2.0, but every request ends up on apaches rootlevel, NameVirtualHost > directive is useless. So, how to forward http(s):// requests through the > Paketfilter matching the right VirtualHost? Maybe i've thought in a wrong > direction, so far. Just some little hints should be enough. I can't be 100% sure because I haven't done this kind of thing myself, but I don't see why port forwarding should interfere with Apache's name-based virtual hosting. After all, they operate on different layers of the OSI model: port forwarding is purely TCP business while VirtualHosts are HTTP. I can tell you, though, that name-based virtual hosting can't be used with https. IIRC this is written in the FAQ on the mod_ssl webpage. -- Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * If it wasn't for C, we'd be using BASI, PASAL and OBOL! _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
