On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:41:32AM -0700, ALeine wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Just so no one gets screwed, the Cacon multifunction devices are > > entierly different beasts from the regular printers. I can't > > find the refrence at the moment, but I looked at them when I was > > shopping for a new multifunction printer and they were rated as > > paperweights. :-( > > Could this be what you're referring to? > > http://www.linuxprinting.org/printer_list.cgi?make=Canon > > That site seems dated as newer models like the MP360 are not even > listed. Besides, about 80 % of the Canon printers which are listed > there have been marked to indicate that some information for those > printers has not been verified. The suggested printers section also > seems to be quite dated and, in that sense, misleading. > > IMHO, there are too many conflicting reviews to really trust any > one such source, but I do tend to trust first-hand experience of > users more than any other source.
No, I found a site that was explicit about it. I just can't seem to find it now. Somewhere there's a listing of multifunction devices. The fact that "Canon multifunction products are not supported in Mac OS X" is all Canon has to say about anything other then Windows is a pretty good hint as to what they think of unix. :-( -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
pgpT8OAsT78uG.pgp
Description: PGP signature