On 2004/10/18, at 2:11, Radek Kozlowski wrote:
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Mark Frank wrote:Yesterday I did a fresh install off of a 5.3beta5 CD and them before going to bed last night I cvsup'ed with a "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5" and a buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel cycle.
I had expected to end up with 5.3beta7 but to my surprise I ended up with
a "uname -a" of:
FreeBSD guinness.local.mark-and-erika.com 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0:
Sun Oct 17 02:47:12 EDT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Do I really have 5.3-STABLE or am I missing something? I can't find any announcement on the freebsd.org web site. Is this really 5.3-STABLE? I assumed there would be a 5.3-RC1...or is this it?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033698.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033702.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-October/033703.html
-Radek
Sorry but I am not very sure about this after reading the above CVS commit messages.
Does that mean if we don't want to follow the -STABLE branch but would like to stick
to 5.3-RELEASE, this is the time to change the tag to "RELENG_5_3" or else we would
end up with -STABLE?
Thanks.
--- Choy Kho Yee url: http://dotkoyi.infoseek.ne.jp/ blog: http://dotkoyi.blogspot.com/
"There are only 10 types of people in the world, i.e. those who understand binary numbers
and those who do not."
_______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
