On Tuesday 19 October 2004 08:59, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > On Monday 18 October 2004 11:10 pm, Christopher Nehren >
> > Hmph. Just a few days ago I was thinking about how Pan deserves a > > 1.0 version number because of its full feature set, stability, and > > so forth. It's never crashed here, and I've been using it since > > before 5.0 existed. > > Really? What version of FreeBSD are you using, and what's your window > manager/desktop? I also find it stable. I'm using KDE 3.3 on 5.2.1. One thing that can cause problems is having too many cached message bodies; I find that it can become less stable above ~3Gig. There *may* also be problem with large groups. I once had a group surge to 180,000 articles and pan crashed several times on it, before I deleted the headers and repulled the most recent 30,000. That might have been a one-off problem with corruption though. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
