On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:47:03 -0700 Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2004 02:41 am, Joshua Tinnin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 October 2004 11:43 am, Ion-Mihai Tetcu > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:06:55 -0700 > > > Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm wondering how to remove a custom patch for a port. I am sort > > > > of new at this, but I've managed to learn how to patch a port and > > > > upgrade it for testing. But I'm not at all sure how to remove > > > > that patch if need be. What I've been doing is removing a chunk > > > > of the ports tree with cd /usr/ports && rm -rf */*portname* and > > > > then cvsup'ping again, but this doesn't seem right or very > > > > efficient. I've read the man page for patch, but the only thing I > > > > can come up with is the reverse option, which I must admit I > > > > don't totally understand. Can anyone explain this in a way that > > > > makes sense? > > > > > > If I understand what you want correctly, all you have to do is to > > > rename the patch from: > > > > > > /usr/ports/cat/your_port/files/patch-you_want_not_applied to > > > something that does not begin with 'patch'. > > > > OK, and thanks by the way, but let's say it's a patch which involves > > several ports as part of a metaport, like xcfe4? Someone else > > recommended just rm -rf all the affected branches and then > > cvsup'ping, which I had been doing, more or less, but it seemed to me > > like that was sort of sloppy (but maybe there isn't a graceful way to > > do this). I was just wondering if there was anything that was the > > equivalent of "unpatch." > > Sorry, let me explain a bit better. Someone posted a patch to -ports to > upgrade xfce4 to the latest version, and I was helping test it. The > patch covered several ports, and it had a few problems and was updated > by the patch author, but I wasn't quite sure how to back out of it and > retest an updated patch without having to cvsup my ports tree and start > over. But like I said, maybe there isn't some other method I'm missing, > and this is the way it's done ... Exactly where did you put this patch ? How did you applied it? it was a patch to the Makefile of the port or a patch for the source of the port ? -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"