On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:50:13PM -0600, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > Nell, > > Just a request, please do not use the term "advertising clause" > > This is a term that was created by the Linux bigots, specifically > people like RMS who is so bigoted he can't see beyond the tip > of his nose. It has never been "advertising" before to give > credit to the authors of a software package until the pro-GPL-anti-BSD > crowd came along. It has also never been a burden of any kind > to include credit to UCB until people started to think it was > because the GPL crowd told them. And many companies used BSD > code without giving credit, and nobody cared. (for example, > Microsoft who used plenty of BSD code including BSD header files > that still had the BSD copyrights in them)
Be that as it may, the term "advertising clause" seems strictly definitive, as it pertains to a clause that refers to advertising. That much at least seems obvious from what Nell fgrep'd for. I don't disagree with the substance of your point, but it is counter- productive to redefine language to suit one's political agenda. > I think it is either extremely mean-spirited to make a big > deal over this or it is a subtle BSD-bash to do so. Nobody in > the BSD community ever coined the term "advertising-clause" this > was forced on us from without, and there is no reason to use > it. > > Ted Mittelstaedt > > ... -- Danny _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"