On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:07:10 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:53:55AM +0100, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back > > > >>it up? > > > > > > > > > > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :) > > > > > > > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around > > > > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so. > > > > > > I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone > > > uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention > > > that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows. > > > > > > > i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures > > by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP > > Gert, this list is for technical support questions about FreeBSD. If > you want to have random discussions about other topics, the > appropriate list is freebsd-chat. > > Thanks, > Kris >
ok _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"