On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:11:19AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Loren M. Lang
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:29 AM
> > To: Ian Smith
> > Cc: Loren M. Lang; Pat Maddox; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: Received mail timestamp is off by 7 hours
> >
> 
> > little bit less reliable using local to UTC unless you are not affected
> > by any daylight savings changes like Arizona in the US or, I'm
> > sure, many
> > other places around the world.
> >
> 
> There's no excuse for a mailserver to not be synced to a NTP source.

I agree, I run ntp on every single computer I own, but I was talking in
general.  But for a server, I'd expect them to use UTC anyways.  The
only advantage I see to local time is support for other oses or reading
the time in the bios, neither of which will probably be a big deal on a
server.  And for desktop users, they may not bother running ntp or even
be on a network.

> 
> Ted

-- 
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.

Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: CEE1 AAE2 F66C 59B5 34CA  C415 6D35 E847 0118 A3D2
 
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to