On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:38:15PM +0000, Chuck Robey wrote: : 1) relative addressing means you have to be forever translating paths in : listings, and very often the number of include paths gets to be rather long.
Okay, I can fix that easily. : The Make(1) man page doesn't show "include", the advertised command is : ".include". If you use .include, then you can modify your make, if you Also fixable. : >How can I include the .h files so the .c files are recompiled when the : >header files they require are changed? GNU make has 'make depend' but I'd : >like a better, BSDmake-centric way, if possible. : : Well, did you look at the files in /usr/share/mk, and specifically : bsd.dep.mk? You can even use the FreeBSD sources to figure out (to use : as examples) how things should work. This is the key I want to get working. I'll take a look at those files, but they are pretty deep. : I honestly keep on switching back and forth, between thinking that the : best make is bmake, or gmake. They both have key items that make them : uniquely better. I haven't decided yet. Most BSD people are (predictably) anti-gmake. I have to use gmake for a Linux project I'm on. Jonathon McKitrick -- My other computer is your Windows box. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
