https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196326
--- Comment #14 from John Marino <[email protected]> --- yes, we all know for a long time that portmgr makes itself exempt for the same rules it imposes on others, and the only way to get it changed is through portmgr so there's zero checks and balances here. It's been a sore subject for a long time. Now that you iterated something that wasn't in question: I'm VERY serious about fixing this. What is the ACCEPTABLE way forward in doing so? If I submit a patch to fix this, I EXPECT that it will be evaluated fairly and in a timely manner. (the normal definitions of those words) I also EXPECT, after all this talk, that some feedback about how this patch could look would be provided NOW. Right now you are flexing your muscles but not providing any sort of help here. Are you going to obstruct this or help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
