On 2005-07-20 16:32, "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 19/07/05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On 2005-07-19 11:16, Joachim Str?mbergson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> My thought was to sync/import the sudo implementation from OpenBSD. Bad >>> idea? >> >> Maybe not so bad if the OpenBSD version of sudo has useful enhancements >> of any sort (i.e. has gone through a thorough security audit, or it >> includes features that are not available through the Ports version, >> or if the OpenBSD sudo uses a BSD and not an ISC-style license). > > <URL:http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html>: > > The ISC copyright is functionally equivalent to a two-term BSD copyright > > with language removed that is made unnecessary by the Berne convention. > > This is the preferred license for new code incorporated into OpenBSD. A > > sample license is included in the source tree as > > /usr/src/share/misc/license.template. > > What's the reason that you'd prefer a BSD-licence over ISC-style licence?
The reason was I happened to be behind a very slow connection when I replied and had not checked the license myself yet. Thanks for the clarification though. I've already looked at: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/sudo/LICENSE Thanks, Giorgos _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
