Hi, It looks like there is a holdup to pushing out u66. In the mean time, can someone mark u60 vulnerable, please?
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Greg Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:57:47PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 11/16/15 02:52 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > Patches for FreeBSD ports tree are maintained by glewis and it is > > > directly generated from public Mercurial, AFAIK. > > > > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u > > > > and its modules: > > > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/corba > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/hotspot > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxp > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jaxws > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/langtools > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/nashorn > > That is correct. I'm a little behind since my diff generating script > didn't cope with 8u66 terribly well. I'll see if I can generate a > good diff for it today. > > -- > Greg Lewis Email : [email protected] > Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com > Information Technology FreeBSD : [email protected] > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
