> On 24 Oct 2017, at 17:25, Ian Lepore <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, lockf -t 0 means to exit without waiting, with status EX_TEMPFAIL, > if the lock cannot be acquired immediately. In light of that, the rest > of your report/request doesn't make sense. Jobs won't stack up, > they'll fail if the prior one is still running.
True! Then I don’t understand what happened. When I saw several processes waiting I assumed it was an unlimited wait. My apologies, I need to look into it more closely. Borja. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
