John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote this message on Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 21:29 +1100:
Sorry you want to ensure a secure (trusted) connection you do it
yourself. You go through other nodes (switches and routers of the
So you're fine w/ all the Comcast users having to switch ISPs? Because
Comcast modifies traffic.
Sure, my ISP in Australia modifies some traffic (how much I don't know
because I haven't looked deeply) first detection of it I setup
mitigation to secure my connection from tampering... where I care about it.
In my case they disabled https access so they could MITM... All my
http(s) traffic now goes through a proxy, and all my network traffic now
exits over a VPN connection to my network in a DC which hosts the top of
my proxy server chain.
So you're now saying that if you use FreeBSD
you can't use Comcast as your ISP?
No, I'm saying if you can't trust ${ISP} to give you your FreeBSD source
untampered with, you should not use ${ISP} as your ISP... don't give a
t*** who ${ISP} is, if you can't trust it, don't use it or mitigate your
trust issues by doing like me.
This argument is circular and pointless, if ${User} is downloading and
compiling FreeBSD from source there is a pretty good chance they know a
little more about Tor than 'I heard this app will allow me anonymity'...
Seriously, you want anonymity and safety I have a device that I'll send
you for free... Its lightweight and simple, it consists of two metal
blades with a pivot in the middle.
Michelle
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
