I'm objecting to your tone, which is nearly always negative. The link I sent states the problem with your tone in a much better and more eloquent way than I can.
I challenge you to change your tone when you post to the list in the future. On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:28 AM Roger Marquis <marq...@roble.com> wrote: > Robert Simmons acerbically replied: > > Since you may not read that essay on open source software, here is the > > salient point for you: > > - For users: remember when filing an issue, opening a pull request or > > making a comment on a project to be grateful that people spend their > free > > time to build software you get to use for free. Keep your frustrations > and > > The problem with Robert Simmons' line of reasoning: > > a) keeping vulxml up to date is a fixable problem, and > > b) ignoring the critical role of FreeBSD's security teams will only > result in FreeBSD boxes being hacked and end-users migrating to > Linux. > > Considering the lack of technical or logical arguments being made > against, for example, larger security teams or security team funding > (after all, we're only talking about timely entries in the vulnerability > database) it would not be unreasonable to conclude that opposition > viewpoints are simply Linux advocates. > > Roger Marquis > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org > " > _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
