> On Sep 20, 2019, at 6:04 PM, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [broken links fixed] > > For consideration... > > SVN really may not offer much in the way of native > internal self authenticating repo to cryptographic levels > of security against bitrot, transit corruption and repo ops, > external physical editing, have much signing options, etc. > Similar to blockchain and ZFS hash merkle-ization, > signing the repo init and later points tags commits, > along with full verification toolset, is useful function.
[...] > Note also CVS, which some BSD's still use (ahem: Open, Net), > is even worse than SVN with zero protection > at all in any component regarding this subject. > > It really time to migrate repo tech to year 2020. Are you sure you are talking about plain text files?May I suggest get rid of the binary only part instead? I imagine how painful it is to do a 'git checkout' of many GiB of data. TeXLive is worth a few and is an eternity here. Lc -- rollingbits — 📧 rollingb...@gmail.com 📧 rollingb...@terra.com.br 📧 rollingb...@yahoo.com 📧 rollingb...@globo.com 📧 rollingb...@icloud.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
