I have to check. We're running a reasonable sized domain ordering system on 5.4 but as I currently don't have access to those machines I cannot check the exact version.
I must correct myself, our stable 2850 is running 5.3-p9. Therefore I cannot say if it's stable because of 5.3 or the relatively light load (java tomcat stuff). Rgds Rutger On Thu, August 18, 2005 14:49, Nicklas B. Westerlund said: > Palle Girgensohn wrote: > >> >> >> --On torsdag, augusti 18, 2005 14.30.44 +0200 Rutger Bevaart >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> It seems that updating our machine to 5.4-p5 (RELEND_5_4) has solved >>> this, >>> or at least made it occur less frequently. Our last reboot was after >>> building and installing the new kernel and it hasn't gone down since. >> >> >> Very interesting. We're still at 5.4-p1. The version bump fixes didn't >> look like they were addressing stability, only security, but why not... > > > I'm running p1 on a few webservers, as p2 (which was the next level when > I set them up) seemed to break parts of the nfs throughput, and since > then I havn't dared patching up anything more. Anyone of you using nfs > on something higher than p1 ? > >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Palle >> >> > > Regards, > Nick. > > Rutger Bevaart :: illian.networks _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-smp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
