On 2008-Nov-12 20:47:37 -0800, Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I plan to commit it tomorrow since I sent it to Tim to test. The 10 can >be tuned but it has kept a bunch of machines at work up. Glad people >don't think it is that it is to wrong :-) It probably could be made >a little more dynamic but I wonder if it would show any real performance >difference and might risk more bugs.
FWIW, I've been running the patch since I first saw Doug post it in Feb 2006 and don't recall ever having problems with mksnap_ffs since applying it (I did before) -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
pgpXbZklXqxzU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
