On Mon, 29 May 2000, Matt Heckaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Mon, 29 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > [...] > : > Is it reasonable to assume that OpenSSH v2 will (should) > : > disappear from ports when/if it goes to the main source tree? > : > : Once we stop supporting FreeBSD 3.x in ports.. > > To be honest, do we WANT to stop supporting it in the ports? I would argue > that this is a case similar to BIND. It takes much longer for a new > version to get merged into -STABLE than it does to get into the ports. I > use BIND as an example here, but the same would apply for OpenSSL. What I > would love to see is ports installing in the same location as the base > program if on an OS with it in the base. > In the latest tar for ipfilter, now it changes the files that came with -STABLE and put the binaries in the same location as STABLE does, so you don't end with 2 binaries in 2 diferent locations. Of course this is not a port but a new version that can be installed directly. Saludos To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
