> You don't want WITNESS_KDB, but WITNESS_SKIPSPIN would probably be > sensible to include.
OK, I will take out the WITNESS_KDB. I am reluctant to add in WITNESS_SKIPSPIN though, as I understand it stops witnessing spin locks, is that right ? As the only error message I have ever got out of all fo this explicitly mentioned spinlocks then I'd rather have them monitored. > That's due to WITNESS_KDB and probably unrelated to your problems. OK, will re-do all those tests - and also revert to the correct subject line for this thread (I am not quite sure why I typed a new one, it's a stupid thing to do as it makes it hard to follow). cheers, -pete. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"